(continuation to my previous posts)
-art does not have to be creative in my opinion. As long as it’s thought, it is art. As long as it surprises, shocks, reassures (or any other reaction, or even none if the goal of the piece of art is to have no reaction), the idea is no longer only yours but also becomes universal. -Art is immortal and completes the creator. So can art be the traces/works of a man that will always remain in the world even if that person dies? I think art can be seen that way..

now I’m not saying it’s this, but in my opinion, art can be:
-the exteriorizing of an idea so that it reaches one of our five senses (so it suggests that it is something created)
-but then if something created is considered art, does it mean that a thousand same pens created by a machine is art? For me, no, cause it’s a machine that is doing the work to create…but for the one who had the idea to create a pen, the production of the pen is art.

@dbarii So even though it was offensive to some, it was
nonetheless a piece of art cause stimulated peoples feelings and ideas, it had creativity and the artist also mastered his tools because I saw it and it was very well made. I believe that if 2 artist have the same amount of creativity but one is better at using his tools, then that artist will have a better chance at being more popular.

@dbarii and a young lady on the floor with all her clothe ripped, suggesting
she was raped and therefor leading u to under stand man like that should be punished, it made news and it was removed

@dbarii Now, just because we don’t like something it doesn’t mean is not art. I guess the creativeness of the artist will tell how much the piece would be liked and of course how well he uses his tools.

now that i think about it actually, the video states that the definition of art is: the expression of creativity, imagination, or both. I agree with this definition, but only to a certain extent. with this said my personal definition of art is: what one determines and interprets as the expression of creativity, imagination, or both. in others words, art is one of those things that is different to everyone, there is never an exact definition to the word, much like what i said about life

to me, this is like asking the question: what is the meaning of life? its an unanswerable question, much like: what is art? u cant say everything is art because that would be contradictory with the fact that if u called everything art then art itself wouldn’t exist. i could spit on the ground with no meaning or feeling and call it art and it would be true, because everything would be art, right? i think instead of questioning art, just create and be creative, dont question life, just live

Art is the way we express a feeling or an idea through any medium, creativity helps to communicate that feeling or idea in a more interesting or pleasing manner, there for the more creativity the better the end result and it helps to practice so that u can master the tools u decide to use

It’s different for everyone, but people have a line drawn or art means nothing to them.
If everything is art, then nothing is art.
If everything is special, nothing is special.
Like if every other person on earth is your friend on facebook, what exactly is a facebook friend worth to you? Discrimination is part of the equation.
My idea of art and yours may be different, since if we both care about art we will likely disagree.

by the way, what i meant with “you can even make them better”, is that if you look at movies for example, they get more realistic and you can thanks to computergraphics, bla bla, do the most amazing things… to me this IS science and development… i could write on for weeks, but i’m tired now

its very very well recreatable… at the time of van gogh, da vinci, raphael, etc. there were many artist who at this time did the same, and maybe sold better or even were better artists, but after all this time this first called just sold better and were remembered… back to medicin, if you recreate penicilin nowadays, you are lame and boring, it’s the same with art, if you paint expressionistic, you are boring, developing is the key, and for THAT, i don’t know any formula, would be boring

Medicine is based in science where people design experiments so they can be recreated over and over and, if all goes as expected, get the same results. Art is completely different. No matter how hard someone tries to re-create a piece of art, it is impossible because art involves something that even science hasn’t figured out completely, and that’s human emotion.

brilliant man! have and exam on this tomz.. really help